<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:amplify="http://amplify.com/xmlns/amplify"
>

<channel>
	<title>judgecarter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://judgecarter.amplify.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com</link>
	<description>Things I Amplify from the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>As we near this epic #hc vote, 54% of voters oppose this plan, 45% strongly oppose it. Are we listening to them?</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/as-we-near-this-epic-hc-vote-54-of-voters-oppose-this-plan-45-strongly-oppose-it-are-we-listening-to-them/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/as-we-near-this-epic-hc-vote-54-of-voters-oppose-this-plan-45-strongly-oppose-it-are-we-listening-to-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rasmussen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rasmussen reports]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strongly favor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strongly oppose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/as-we-near-this-epic-hc-vote-54-of-voters-oppose-this-plan-45-strongly-oppose-it-are-we-listening-to-them/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.rasmussenreports.comThe latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone poll, taken Friday and Saturday nights, shows that 41% of likely voters favor the health care plan. Fifty-four percent (54%) are opposed. These figures have barely budged in recent months. Another finding that has remained constant is that the intensity is stronger among those who oppose the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: B76FFF28-FE5E-4AD5-9856-D5735004BC23 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform">www.rasmussenreports.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone poll, taken Friday and Saturday nights, shows that 41% of likely voters favor the health care plan. Fifty-four percent (54%) are opposed. These figures have <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/march_2010/43_favor_health_care_plan_53_oppose2">barely budged</a> in recent months. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Another finding that has remained constant is that the intensity is stronger among those who oppose the plan. The latest findings include 26% who Strongly Favor the plan and 45% who Strongly Oppose it. </p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform">Read more at www.rasmussenreports.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/as-we-near-this-epic-hc-vote-54-of-voters-oppose-this-plan-45-strongly-oppose-it-are-we-listening-to-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.rasmussenreports.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real arithmetic of health care reform - raising deficits by $562 Billion</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/the-real-arithmetic-of-health-care-reform-raising-deficits-by-562-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/the-real-arithmetic-of-health-care-reform-raising-deficits-by-562-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[billion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[congressional budget office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/the-real-arithmetic-of-health-care-reform-raising-deficits-by-562-billion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.nytimes.comThe Real Arithmetic of Health Care Reform ON Thursday, the Congressional Budget Office reported that, if enacted, the latest health care reform legislation would, over the next 10 years, cost about $950 billion, but because it would raise some revenues and lower some costs, it would also lower federal deficits by $138 billion.Could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 638D3377-3C49-4B37-B98C-6B62A3063F45 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print">www.nytimes.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1>The Real Arithmetic of Health Care Reform </h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>ON Thursday, the <a rel="nofollow" title="Congressional Budget Office blog posting" href="http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=508">Congressional Budget Office reported</a> that, if enacted, the latest health care reform legislation would, over the next 10 years, cost about $950 billion, but because it would raise some revenues and lower some costs, it would also lower federal deficits by $138 billion.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Could this really be true? How can the budget office give a green light to a bill that commits the federal government to spending nearly $1 trillion more over the next 10 years?</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The answer, unfortunately, is that the budget office is required to take written legislation at face value and not second-guess the plausibility of what it is handed. So fantasy in, fantasy out.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>In reality, if you strip out all the gimmicks and budgetary games and rework the calculus, a wholly different picture emerges: The health care reform legislation would raise, not lower, federal deficits, by $562 billion.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print">Read more at www.nytimes.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/21/the-real-arithmetic-of-health-care-reform-raising-deficits-by-562-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?pagewanted=print</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.nytimes.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idaho is the first to sign a law against health care reform</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/idaho-is-the-first-to-sign-a-law-against-health-care-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/idaho-is-the-first-to-sign-a-law-against-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president barack obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[republican gov]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/idaho-is-the-first-to-sign-a-law-against-health-care-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from news.yahoo.comIdaho first to sign law against health care reformIdaho is leading the charge in a states-rights push to defeat a proposal in Congress that would require people to buy health insurance, a key piece of reforms being pushed by President Barack Obama.Republican Gov. C.L. &#8220;Butch&#8221; Otter used a ceremony Wednesday afternoon to become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 85930432-5AF9-41EF-B9DF-4BA28F7A0D2D CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5">news.yahoo.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1>Idaho first to sign law against health care reform</h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Idaho is leading the charge in a states-rights push to defeat a proposal in Congress that would require people to buy <span>health insurance</span>, a key piece of reforms being pushed by <span>President Barack Obama</span>.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Republican Gov. C.L. &#8220;Butch&#8221; Otter used a ceremony Wednesday afternoon to become the first governor to sign into law a measure requiring the state attorney general to sue the federal government over any such insurance mandates.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>There&#8217;s similar legislation pending in 37 other states, a point <span>Otter</span> stressed when asked if the bill he signed can succeed, given <span>constitutional law experts</span> are already saying <span>federal laws</span> would supersede those of states in a <span>U.S. District Court</span> fight.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5">Read more at news.yahoo.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/idaho-is-the-first-to-sign-a-law-against-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states;_ylt=ApccYuI2oC1WUbp0nbf0LO6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN0czF2M2Q1BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzE4L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9vdmVyaGF1bF9zdGF0ZXMEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>news.yahoo.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>I went to this great symposium yesterday on helping Army women transition from the frontlines.</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/i-went-to-this-great-symposium-yesterday-on-helping-army-women-transition-from-the-frontlines/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/i-went-to-this-great-symposium-yesterday-on-helping-army-women-transition-from-the-frontlines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[annual army women]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[army women foundation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[attend]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[more than]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[transition symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/i-went-to-this-great-symposium-yesterday-on-helping-army-women-transition-from-the-frontlines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.foxbusiness.comMore Than 200 Attend the U.S. Army Women Foundation&#8217;s 2nd Annual Army Women in Transition SymposiumThe U.S. Army Women&#8217;s Foundation today hosted its 2nd Annual Army Women in Transition Symposium and Hall of Fame Luncheon on Capitol Hill from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. with more than 200 people attending the two events. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 2ECAA6A8-8E32-4261-B13B-981A79EB38F2 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/" href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/">www.foxbusiness.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1>More Than 200 Attend the U.S. Army Women Foundation&#8217;s 2nd Annual Army Women in Transition Symposium</h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The U.S. Army Women&#8217;s Foundation today hosted its 2nd Annual Army Women in Transition Symposium and Hall of Fame Luncheon on Capitol Hill from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. with more than 200 people attending the two events. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The Symposium included three panels, which analyzed current programs helping servicewomen transition from the frontlines to a civilian career, the corporate world, or the classroom: </p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/" href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/">Read more at www.foxbusiness.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/18/i-went-to-this-great-symposium-yesterday-on-helping-army-women-transition-from-the-frontlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/attend-army-women-foundations-nd-annual-army-women-transition-symposium/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.foxbusiness.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi: &#8220;Nobody wants to vote for the Senate bill&#8221; Uh, then why are you making them??</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/16/pelosi-nobody-wants-to-vote-for-the-senate-bill-uh-then-why-are-you-making-them/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/16/pelosi-nobody-wants-to-vote-for-the-senate-bill-uh-then-why-are-you-making-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[john fund]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nobody wants]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/16/pelosi-nobody-wants-to-vote-for-the-senate-bill-uh-then-why-are-you-making-them/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from online.wsj.com&#8216;Nobody Wants to Vote for the Senate bill&#8217; The Democratic spin explaining why polls show the public opposed to their health care bill is that voters actually like the individual pieces of the bill but have been turned off by the messy process.But it appears that Democrats are ignoring their own findings. Last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: E254FC02-F79C-438F-ACB4-F8028785ED81 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines">online.wsj.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1>&#8216;Nobody Wants to Vote for the Senate bill&#8217; </h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The Democratic spin explaining why polls show the public opposed to their health care bill is that voters actually like the individual pieces of the bill but have been turned off by the messy process.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>But it appears that Democrats are ignoring their own findings. Last week, President Obama backed away from his earlier demand that lawmakers&#8217; special deals be stripped out of the bill. Then there&#8217;s Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who yesterday endorsed a parliamentary maneuver under which the House would &#8220;deem&#8221; the Senate&#8217;s health care bill approved without the House voting on it.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Ms. Pelosi actually told reporters: &#8220;Nobody wants to vote for the Senate bill.&#8221;<span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines">Read more at online.wsj.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/16/pelosi-nobody-wants-to-vote-for-the-senate-bill-uh-then-why-are-you-making-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125693906113572.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>online.wsj.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Budget Committee approves reconciliation bill &#8230; one step closer to #hc takeover</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/15/house-budget-committee-approves-reconciliation-bill-one-step-closer-to-hc-takeover/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/15/house-budget-committee-approves-reconciliation-bill-one-step-closer-to-hc-takeover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[approves]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[committee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[house budget committee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reconciliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/15/house-budget-committee-approves-reconciliation-bill-one-step-closer-to-hc-takeover/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from voices.washingtonpost.comHouse Budget Committee approves reconciliation billThe House Budget Committee voted 21 to 16 to send the health care legislation to the House Rules Committee. That panel is expected to meet Thursday to draft new language for the reconciliation bill, compiling a package of fixes to the $875 billion measure that passed the Senate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 707C2FB9-8814-4CF3-91F4-7ECCD809CF90 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44">voices.washingtonpost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>House Budget Committee approves reconciliation bill</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>The House Budget Committee voted 21 to 16 to send the health care legislation to the House Rules Committee. That panel is expected to meet Thursday to draft new language for the reconciliation bill, compiling a package of fixes to the $875 billion measure that passed the Senate on Christmas Eve.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>A key House committee voted Monday to advance <a rel="nofollow" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/health-care-reform/">President Obama&#8217;s plan</a> to overhaul the nation&#8217;s health-care system, clearing the way for the House to vote on the measure later this week.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>A key House committee voted Monday to advance <a rel="nofollow" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/health-care-reform/">President Obama&#8217;s plan</a> to overhaul the nation&#8217;s health-care system, clearing the way for the House to vote on the measure later this week.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>A key House committee voted Monday to advance <a rel="nofollow" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/health-care-reform/">President Obama&#8217;s plan</a> to overhaul the nation&#8217;s health-care system, clearing the way for the House to vote on the measure later this week.<span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44">Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/15/house-budget-committee-approves-reconciliation-bill-one-step-closer-to-hc-takeover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/03/house-budget-committee-approve.html?wprss=44</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>voices.washingtonpost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More trouble for #hc ? Hispanic Caucus not on board bc the takeover doesn&#8217;t do enough for illegal immigrants.</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/more-trouble-for-hc-hispanic-caucus-not-on-board-bc-the-takeover-doesnt-do-enough-for-illegal-immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/more-trouble-for-hc-hispanic-caucus-not-on-board-bc-the-takeover-doesnt-do-enough-for-illegal-immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hispanic caucus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[provision]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[threatening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/more-trouble-for-hc-hispanic-caucus-not-on-board-bc-the-takeover-doesnt-do-enough-for-illegal-immigrants/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from thehill.comImmigration provision has Hispanic Caucus threatening &#8216;no&#8217; health voteA group of Hispanic lawmakers on Thursday will tell President Barack Obama that they may not vote for healthcare reform unless changes are made to the bill&#8217;s immigration provisions.not The Senate language would prohibit illegal immigrants&#8217; buying healthcare coverage from the proposed health exchanges. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 38B6FC3F-AD3E-4416-8F80-1343A810B71D CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare" href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare">thehill.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div id="AutoGeneratedID-0"><h1>Immigration provision has Hispanic Caucus threatening &#8216;no&#8217; health vote</h1></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>A group of Hispanic lawmakers on Thursday will tell President Barack Obama that they may not vote for healthcare reform unless changes are made to the bill&#8217;s immigration provisions.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>not </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The Senate language would prohibit illegal immigrants&#8217; buying healthcare coverage from the proposed health exchanges. The House-passed bill isn&#8217;t as restrictive, but it does &#8212; like the Senate bill &#8212; bar illegal immigrants from receiving federal subsidies to buy health insurance. <br /></p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Hispanic Democrats say they haven&#8217;t moved from their stance that they will not vote for a healthcare bill containing the Senate&#8217;s prohibitions. <br /><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare" href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare">Read more at thehill.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/more-trouble-for-hc-hispanic-caucus-not-on-board-bc-the-takeover-doesnt-do-enough-for-illegal-immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://thehill.com/homenews/house/86125-hispanic-caucus-threat-to-vote-no-on-healthcare</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>thehill.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why in the world would you tie a student loan takeover to the healthcare takeover?</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/why-in-the-world-would-you-tie-a-student-loan-takeover-to-the-healthcare-takeover/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/why-in-the-world-would-you-tie-a-student-loan-takeover-to-the-healthcare-takeover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health-care]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[overhaul]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[student]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/why-in-the-world-would-you-tie-a-student-loan-takeover-to-the-healthcare-takeover/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.washingtonpost.comKey senators balk at adding student loan overhaul to health-care legislationDemocratic leaders in Congress are weighing whether to add another of President Obama&#8217;s priorities to the package: a popular proposal to overhaul the federal student loan program. But key senators are objecting to the move, arguing that political resistance in the Senate and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: D6F2B8B5-7088-483A-969B-0C451D29BA94 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html">www.washingtonpost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1>Key senators balk at adding student loan overhaul to health-care legislation</h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Democratic leaders in Congress are weighing whether to add another of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Barack_Obama">President Obama</a>&#8217;s priorities to the package: a popular proposal to overhaul the federal student loan program. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>But key senators are objecting to the move, arguing that political resistance in the Senate and the rapidly rising cost of the education measure could jeopardize efforts to push health-care reform to final passage. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Rather than saving $50 billion over the next decade, the student loan initiative is now projected to increase deficits by about $5 billion</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Advocates of the loan program urged congressional budget leaders Tuesday simply to use the old estimate when putting the reconciliation package together.<span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html">Read more at www.washingtonpost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/11/why-in-the-world-would-you-tie-a-student-loan-takeover-to-the-healthcare-takeover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/10/AR2010031003934.html</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.washingtonpost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A good @USAToday editorial on the ethics committee and draining the swamp</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/10/a-good-usatoday-editorial-on-the-ethics-committee-and-draining-the-swamp/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/10/a-good-usatoday-editorial-on-the-ethics-committee-and-draining-the-swamp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[enforcers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[honesty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/10/a-good-usatoday-editorial-on-the-ethics-committee-and-draining-the-swamp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from blogs.usatoday.comOur view on honesty in government: House ethics enforcers leave Congress mired in the muckCommittee members find ways to excuse colleagues&#8217; bad behaviorWhat does it take for a member of Congress to get in real trouble with the House ethics committee?Quite a lot.In fact, only one lawmaker &#8212; Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y. &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 7D7321A9-CCB6-4165-A629-477A5298BD87 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html" href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html">blogs.usatoday.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Our view on honesty in government: House ethics enforcers leave Congress mired in the muck</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Committee members find ways to excuse colleagues&#8217; bad behavior</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>What does it take for a member of Congress to get in real trouble with the House ethics committee?</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Quite a lot.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>In fact, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-02-25-rangel-ethics_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip">only one lawmaker</a> &#8212; Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y. &#8212; has merited even a wrist slap since Democrats were swept into the majority in 2007 on a wave of voter revulsion to scandals engulfing Republicans in Congress. Back then, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pushed through more stringent rules, vowed stricter enforcement and famously promised to &#8220;drain the swamp.&#8221;</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Well, she&#8217;s going to need a bigger pump.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html" href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html">Read more at blogs.usatoday.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/10/a-good-usatoday-editorial-on-the-ethics-committee-and-draining-the-swamp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/03/debate-on-honesty-in-government-our-view-house-ethics-enforcers-leave-congress-mired-in-the-muck.html</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>blogs.usatoday.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New poll shows Democrats losing ground on national security</title>
		<link>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/09/new-poll-shows-democrats-losing-ground-on-national-security/</link>
		<comments>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/09/new-poll-shows-democrats-losing-ground-on-national-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rep John Carter</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democracy corps]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dick cheney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ground]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/09/new-poll-shows-democrats-losing-ground-on-national-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from voices.washingtonpost.comNew poll shows Democrats losing ground on national securityAfter closing the so-called &#8220;national security gap&#8221; in the 2006 and 2008 elections, congressional Democrats are losing ground on the issue, according to a new poll done by the Democratic firm of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. (The survey was done for Democracy Corps and Third [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 81D2B560-BFF7-4168-B765-CA6E4265D85B CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix">voices.washingtonpost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div id="entryhead"><h1>New poll shows Democrats losing ground on national security</h1></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>After closing the so-called &#8220;national security gap&#8221; in the 2006 and 2008 elections, congressional Democrats are losing ground on the issue, according to a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gqrr.com/index.php?ID=2428">new poll done by the Democratic firm of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research</a>. (The survey was done for Democracy Corps and Third Way.) Asked which party would do a better job on national security, 50 percent of likely voters chose Republicans while 33 percent opted for Democrats.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>The reason for the slippage? &#8220;Historical doubts about the Democratic Party on national security show signs of reviving as many voters worry the president and his Administration are not dealing forcefully enough with terrorist suspects,&#8221; according to Greenberg.<span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix">Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgecarter.amplify.com/2010/03/09/new-poll-shows-democrats-losing-ground-on-national-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/morning-fix/39-democrats-slip-on-national-security.html?wprss=thefix</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>voices.washingtonpost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
